Hey Adam - thanks for your comment. I find myself using Claude and Gemini more and ChatGPT less. (I made a short post about that here - https://substack.com/@nathanrodgers/note/c-193353784?r=fx6m2). I find for things related to copy/voice analysis, Claude does a better job. I did try this in ChatGPT and the output was okay, but just not as robust as Claude gave me. I got a full breakdown from Claude, including the two-part structure ChatGPT completely missed. Claude also gave me power words and ideas on how to apply the frameworks to my own headlines. All without a bunch of back-and-forth prompting. You can do something like this for almost anything. Reverse engineer Substack Notes that are doing well, viral Tik Tok or Instagram posts, YouTube video titles, etc.
A great framework to use! I also prefer Claude when it comes to creating narrative.
Solid breakdown Nathan, clear and practical.
Quick question out of curiosity. Why Claude for this workflow? Did you test GPT or Copilot as well?
I would love to hear what worked especially well for you, where you saw limits of Claude, and who you would recommend this setup for in practice.
Hey Adam - thanks for your comment. I find myself using Claude and Gemini more and ChatGPT less. (I made a short post about that here - https://substack.com/@nathanrodgers/note/c-193353784?r=fx6m2). I find for things related to copy/voice analysis, Claude does a better job. I did try this in ChatGPT and the output was okay, but just not as robust as Claude gave me. I got a full breakdown from Claude, including the two-part structure ChatGPT completely missed. Claude also gave me power words and ideas on how to apply the frameworks to my own headlines. All without a bunch of back-and-forth prompting. You can do something like this for almost anything. Reverse engineer Substack Notes that are doing well, viral Tik Tok or Instagram posts, YouTube video titles, etc.
This is a great idea, I love Matt's work.
Glad you found it helpful!
Claude seems much better at that than ChatGPT